|
Annotated
Bibliography |
|
Annotations
vs. Abstracts: The Differences |
The
Process
|
|
Evaluation
Criteria |
Writing
Tips | Sample
Annotated Bibliography Entry
|
Abstracts
vs. Annotations: The Differences
 |
An annotated bibliography requires more than a summarization of your
sources. Be sure to provide evaluative "annotations" and not
simply descriptive "abstracts."
- Abstracts are descriptive summaries.
They are often found at the beginning of scholarly journal
articles or in periodical indexes (electronic databases).
Abstracts summarize the contents of an information resource.
- Annotations
are descriptive and critical.
They expose the author's point of view, discuss his/her clarity and
appropriateness of expression and evaluate the author's authority.
|
|
Important:
If you use an electronic database to locate materials for your annotated
bibliography, remember that copying and pasting or even
rephrasing the abstracts provided by the database is plagiarism.
Electronic databases are covered under copyright law and therefore,
using a database to
create annotations without actually READING
the article they refer
you
to is highly unethical. |
|
The
Process
 |
Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a
variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct
analysis and informed library research.
-
First, locate and record
citations to books, periodical articles and Internet sites that may
contain useful information and ideas on your topic.
-
Briefly examine and
review the actual items and then choose those works that provide
a variety of perspectives on your topic.
-
Cite each book, article or
document using APA documentation style. (See additional instructions
below.) -
Write a concise annotation
following each citation, summarizing the central theme and scope of
the book, article or document and analyzing the work as it relates
to your project. (See evaluation criteria
below.)
|
Evaluation
Criteria
 |
Each annotation should include as many of the following criteria as
possible:
-
Evaluate the
authority or background of the author.
Who is this person? Why do you think he or she is qualified to write about
the topic? -
Comment on the
intended audience.
What is the the writing style of the author? Is the language
used by this author easy to understand or is it filled with
technical jargon, acronyms and other terminology? -
Compare or contrast
this work with another you have cited.
How does what this author has to say about the topic compare with
the other authors you have read? -
Explain how this
work illuminates your research topic.
How will you use this source in your project? Is it basic
background information, scholarly research or one person's opinion
about your topic? Do you agree or disagree with the author?
-
Mention bibliographies,
charts, graphs, statistics or illustrations if they are important
to your project.
-
Comment on any bias
or point of view shown in the work.
Is the author objective or
subjective? Is
the author trying to persuade you to think a certain way about an
issue? Is the author trying to sell you something?
For additional guidance in
evaluating your sources see Critically
Analyzing Information Sources.
|
Writing
Tips
 |
-
Do not fill space with
generalizations (e.g., "This book is good...," "Smith
is an interesting writer...," etc.).
-
Avoid such adjectives as
"excellent" and "good."
-
Avoid the first person
singular ("I").
-
Do not begin each annotation
with "This book..." or "This article...".
|
Sample
Annotated Bibliography Entry
 |
Document your sources using APA documentation style. You will find
examples of APA documentation in your writer's guide or on this web site:
The following example uses the correct
APA citation format for a periodical article:
Waite, L. J.,
Goldscheider, F. K., & Witsberger, C.
(1986). Nonfamily living
and the erosion of traditional family
orientations among young adults.
American Sociological Review,
51(4), 541-554.
The authors, researchers at the
Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the
National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to
test their hypothesis that non-family living by young adults
alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving
them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find
their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the
effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the
time away from parents before marrying increased individualism,
self-sufficiency and changes in attitudes about families. In
contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no
significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result
of non-family living.
|
| Modified with
permission from: Paula Moskowitz, Assistant
Coordinator of Library Instruction, Manhattanville
College Library. |